Direct train to Europe

This is a good post to follow our Berlin adventures, and explains why we had to fly EasyJet rather than get a direct train London-Berlin.  In this article, the BBC looks at the new Eurostar service to Marseille and gives some thought to why we haven’t got direct trains elsewhere in Europe….

You can now board a train in London and a few hours later get off by the Mediterranean – the new direct service between St Pancras and Marseille is the furthest passengers have ever been able to go on a train from Britain without getting off. But why, more than 20 years after the Channel Tunnel opened, have direct services to the rest of Europe been so slow arriving?……

In a way the most straightforward problem to explain is the technology.  You can’t run any old train through the tunnel – currently only the Eurostar trains themselves comply with safety regulations.  In addition you need to have all the signalling systems on board for every country you pass through – and no two major countries use exactly the same system. Eurostars are already crammed with the equipment for the UK, for France and for Belgium and there’s physically no room for anything else….

One factor which may have changed since Eurostar began is how long passengers will sit on a train.  After 9/11 air travel started to become far more time-consuming….   People used to say no-one wanted to be on a train for more than three hours but I think four would now be more accurate.  That’s talking about business travel. If people are travelling for leisure – and if we can make their journey definitely part of the holiday – then probably six or seven hours is acceptable to the right destination……

The start of Eurostar pretty much coincided with the launch of budget airlines in Europe. That did for some of the more ambitious plans and competition with air is the second big consideration hindering expansion…..

The third big problem complicating expansion of services through the tunnel (is) Britain not being part of the EU Schengen treaty and retaining passport controls…

.But this is a very poor excuse…

“Sadly some very attractive destinations are in the wrong place. How wonderful if you could get from London to Barcelona in under four hours on a train. Unfortunately geography is in the way.”

_83275415_hi027006414

Posted in ESNG, Inspiration, Out and about, Prototype | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Bartlett’s in Berlin – 3

The area around the Warschauer Str. terminus is of both railway and historic interest.  Behind the station itself is this small maintenance shed, and a large carriage shed.  I don’t think Lidl are now operating trains!  Although I didn’t see any trains enter the shed, I suspect the trains are on the elevated level and there is a Lidl store underneath.  At least, I hope so…..

b-3-1 b-3-2

Leaving the terminus, the train crosses the River Spree by the Oberbaum bridge.  This was a Cold War crossing point from east to west, and trains were unable to cross the river to the Warschauer Str. terminus.  Old aerial photographs show all the tracks lifted.  But with reunification, the terminus came back into use.  The 3 photos below are taken from where the Berlin Wall and crossing point would have been. The longest remaining section of wall, decorated with murals lies behind me as I took the photos.

b-3-3 b-3-4 b-3-5

After crossing the bridge the line curves away to the right.  This location is very model-like, and would make a fine scene for a model railway.  The second shot comes from Wikipedia, I’m afraid, as we didn’t manage a boat trip on the Spree (Ruth was worried that they would be full of Barcelona and Juventus supporters – not a nice thought in a confined space), and this is such a good shot of the attractive bridge structure.

b-3-6b-3-7

The next station along the line, Schlesisches Tor, is a fine piece of railway architecture (as is the next station along).  Many of the other stations along the line are simple train sheds, perhaps indicating war-time bomb damage.

b-3-8

To close out our Berlin adventures here’s a video of the U-Bahn, an alternative form of transport of the Spree (I love float planes, but you wouldn’t catch me on anything smaller than a Sunderland), and the family at the amazingly OTT Russian war memorial at Trepnow Park.

b-3-9 b-3-10

Posted in ESNG, Inspiration, Out and about, Prototype | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Bartlett’s in Berlin – 2

Just next to the Warstrauer Str. U-Bahn station was the S-Bahn station and the DB main lines.  I suppose in UK London terms, the U-Bahn is like London Underground, whilst the S-Bahn is more like London commuter trains – the stations are further apart and the lines are generally above ground.  The S-Bahn trains we travelled on looked to have more wear and tear than the U-Bahn – perhaps new units are due.  Both systems use a raised 3rd rail, as shown below.  I guess this system is easier to keep going in the winter snow, and not prone to complete failure, like the low-level UK system.

b-2-1 b-2-2 b-2-3

Next to the station were carriage sidings, mainly holding sleeping car trains.  I was pleased to see that DB also have a problem with graffiti.  And even more delighted to see a real-life Talgo train parked in a siding.  These lightweight carriage sets, with a single pair of wheels on each carriage, fascinate me.  I’ve always admired models of them, but the real thing was even better.  Not sure I want to travel on one though – I’d rather have 8 wheels under me.

b-2-4 b-2-5

On the other side were the DB main line tracks, coming in from what would have been East Germany in the past.  There was an interesting mixture of ICE high speed trains, inter-city locomotive hauled stock, and local multiple units.  And what to me seemed a rather antique diesel helping shut the yard.  No goods trains, though, so close into the centre of the city.  The civil engineering work being carried out appears to be adding more main line running tracks.  It was good to see a system that is actively adding capacity to its lines.

b-2-6b-2-8 b-2-7 b-2-9 b-2-10

My next, and last, post of Berlin will return to the U-Bahn.

Posted in ESNG, Inspiration, Out and about, Prototype | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Bartlett’s in Berlin – 1

Maxine and I recently spent a long weekend in Berlin, visiting our eldest daughter.  We thoroughly enjoyed Berlin, despite having chosen to visit the same weekend as the Champion’s League (football) final.  It’s an interesting city, the greenest in Europe, with all those Cold War connotations, and endless quality museums (no we didn’t visit the currywurst museum).

And there was considerable railway interest as well.  Although it was coincidental, as Ruth works in the hotel, I was delighted to be able to sit at breakfast and watch yellow U-Bahn trains enter the Warschauer Str. terminus, elevated on an attractive brick viaduct, with yellow bendy-trams in the adjacent road.  Here’s the view leaving the hotel….

b-1-1 b-1-2 b-1-3 b-1-4

That’s what I call a location!  The final photograph is looking down to the River Spree and the location of a long remaining section of the Berlin Wall.  We didn’t need to take a tram ride, but I was very impressed by the compact articulated units, that could turn on a radius better suited to a small 4-wheeled car.

b-1-5 b-1-6 b-1-7

We used the U-Bahn extensively, especially as we were just 3 stations from Ruth’s apartment.  This final shot today is the little 2-car train that shuttles from the central Berlin station, Hauptbahnhof, two short stops to the Brandenburg Gate (unfortunately taken over by EUFA for a football exhibition, but still a sight to see).  It’s some time, I think, since I went on a 2-car train, and this was an older unit with metal handles that opened the (powered) sliding doors.  The central station is just a few years old, and it is quite something – a brand new steel and glass station that looks more like Bluewater or an airport with the shopping malls on several levels.  Even the trains are on three levels, and two levels cross at 90 degrees.

b-1-8

Friday was a full day’s tourism, to allow Ruth to get a little work done.  Packed into the day were the Brandenburg Gate, the Holocaust Memorial and the underground Holocaust Museum (moving, gruelling, but an impeccable presentation).  Then on to the parking lot site of Hitler’s bunker, to Checkpoint Charlie (nothing to see, a tourist trap, but for those of a certain age, walking through Checkpoint Charlie just has to be done), and finally to the Jewish Museum (an interesting museum in a fine building).  Well, they were all in the same part of the city and more or less on a straight line.  After that we slowed down a bit!!

Next time, the S-Bahn and main line DB trains.

Posted in ESNG, Inspiration, Out and about, Prototype | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Why do layouts fail?

Good words from Lance Mindheim:

When I work with a design client, one question I always ask is why previous layouts didn’t get off the ground and gain critical mass.  After almost fifteen years the answers haven’t changed.  The three reasons layouts fail, the three headed monster if you will are:  the layout dimensions were too large, the design was too complex, or poor ergonomics.  It’s not uncommon to have all three at once.   The one issue that, to this day, has never come up is a layout that was too small or simple.  Nobody has ever said, “Well the layout was too simple and I quickly got bored with it.”  It just doesn’t happen.  Where we get off track is grossly missing the mark in terms of how little track it takes to keep us blissfully entertained.  It doesn’t take much, even if we aren’t ‘pure operators’.  For those that are operators, as our knowledge increases, the necessary track volume decreases further.   Here’s a design exercise for those of you with a typical large bedroom or half basement to work with.  Set a hard and fast limit of fifteen turnouts and stick to that.  It will take some discipline but see if you can come up with a design that sticks to that limit.

The third trap, ergonomics, is dangerous because it’s so subtle.  Our discomfort and dissatisfaction with a layout with poor ergonomics is often hidden in our sub-conscious.   We find our enthusiasm dwindling with each passing year and aren’t sure why.  The key word here is ‘easy access’.  It is absolutely critical that ALL track be within easy ‘grab and go’, arms reach, accessible distance.  For your average person this means no further than 27 inches from the fascia.  It also means avoiding hidden track at all costs.  Long tunnels, hidden staging, hard to reach staging are deal killers.  The scary part is the problem isn’t so obvious during the first year when your enthusiasm is so high that you are willing to overlook any and all inconvenience.

I’ve mentioned before that I’m frequently viewed as a champion of small layouts.  That’s not the case at all.  I’m a champion of designs that quickly and easily get people immersed in the hobby.  It just so happens that for most people smaller and simpler layouts are the best way to do that.

We could all learn from this – simple layouts are best.  If you have a large space available for the railway, don’t take on Clapham Junction, just spread out a few turnouts over a larger area…

 

Posted in Hints and tips, Inspiration, Layout design | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Off my trolley – Pacific Electric to Watts – 3

Finally, could one model the northern end, at Oscar’s junction, or the southern end, at Watts, of the four-track main line?  The prototype track layouts below are taken from the Model Railroader article.  Both have real potential as stand-alone layouts, but may need some adaptation for modular use.  I haven’t drawn these up, as yet, but just suggested a few modifications for modular use.

Oscar’s Junction

Perhaps Oscar’s Junction is the easier of the two.  There are four tracks all the way through from the Watts end to the Eighth Street Yard leads.  One would, however, have to accept trains running through the small yard on the opposite side of the tracks to Long Beach Avenue.  Incidentally, the metal sheds in the yard were still standing just a few years ago.

If building this for N-mod, it might be best to flatten out the gentle S-curve of the prototype.  The double track lines leading to Main Street Terminal could provide an N-club link, provided an extra link was added between the double track section and the small yard.  Perhaps there is indeed potential for Oscar’s Junction and modules?

oscar_plan

Watts

Watts is rather more difficult.  The station itself and the single freight road would be easy to model.  The slips and crossovers leading from all four tracks into the car shed and yard would also be easy to model, although care might be needed in track laying with the slips on the main lines.

The main modular challenge is the triple junction, as the main lines scatter to various destinations.  One option would be to simply run four tracks past the car shed and keep the linear modules.  This would look good, and make an interesting model, but it would loose something of Watts’character.  A better option would be to modify the track layout slightly, so that one of the three lines (probably the one to Long Beach) becomes a dummy junction.  The other two double-tracked lines could then link up in a loop and form an end loop for an N-mod linear layout.  Looking more closely, the links are actually already there – the Santa Ana line can run from tracks 1 and 3, and the Torrance line from tracks 2 and 4.  This would need an operator in charge, as there is a diamond crossing where lines 2 and 3 cross!

Yes, Watts is difficult, but it still has potential for an N-mod layout.

watts_plan

And here’s a final photograph, taken just north of Watts in 1948 (by G. Krambles) showing the character of the main line.


Maxine and I have just had a long weekend in Berlin seeing our eldest daughter.  Hopefully, I’ll have been allowed to look at a few trains or trams, and there will be photos to follow….

 

 

Posted in Inspiration, Layout design, Prototype, Traction | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

What would you change?

Mike Cougil contributes another thought provoking post.  He starts with….

If you had a blank slate to begin again in the craft, would you change anything? Would you switch scales, stick with the same theme, explore a different one or, do nothing different at all?

And goes on to list some of the things he might do differently.  I’ve summarised a few of them here….

It truly is a journey
My interests are not what they were twenty years ago when I returned to the craft.  The recent changes reflect a maturity that I didn’t have then. I’ve been active in this craft for a number of years now and have done most of the things I thought I wanted to do with it, though there are still  avenues I would enjoy exploring and pushing my own ideas of what a layout can be is one of them….

Size is not the only criteria
I’m very aware of the arguments and the bias against smaller layouts….  What I personally find so compelling is the discipline required to effectively design one.  You have to be disciplined in your choices and expectations and not everyone is willing to do that or understands how to exercise such restraint.  I think it’s better to frame the conversation around thoughtfully considered and well crafted design principles rather than square footage.

Everyone can have quality
What many of us really want is a layout that truly satisfies our vision.  This is a quality in which the actual square footage involved is irrelevant….  My route to a satisfying layout has been to eliminate the compromises that assumed or seldom used features usually require, such as the toy train character of my curve….  All of these ideas represent a relaxed approach to the craft that has brought me to a satisfying place.

Lighting
I’ve never been happy with the lighting of my layouts over the years….   Properly lighting a small object like a model is an art form in its own right that few of us understand well.

Lighting commands our attention
In his comments on a recent post, reader Simon Dunkley offered an analogy from the theater of the lights dimming at the end of a scene.  I think that would be an interesting way to actually end an operating session.  With the ever growing number of options (including dimmable) now available for LEDs, poor lighting can be a thing of the past….

Presentation
I’ve touched on this subject before and by presentation, I’m referring to the entirety of what one sees, from the actual modeling and how the layout itself is introduced and presented.  I have seen examples of exhibition layouts that would rival any museum display in their interpretation, signage and lighting….  I find this style of modeling very intriguing, because it speaks to the artistry and craft that I enjoy.  I also think there is a wonderful opportunity in layout presentation to help the public understand our craft beyond the stereotype of toy trains….

Read it all HERE.

 

Posted in Hints and tips, Inspiration, Layout design | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Off my trolley – Pacific Electric to Watts – 2

Now for a couple of simple ideas for Pacific Electric N-mod modules.  I’ve selected two places where other lines crossed the four-track main line.  The first of these, nearest Watts, is at Slauson Tower, where the ATSF Harbor branch crossed the PE.  The ATSF paralleled Slauson Avenue, as can be still seen today on Google Earth, even when the rails are all gone.  The delightful picture below shows a PE freight at the tower.  Yes, the diesel units heading the train do have trolley poles – they were fitted to trip the train detection equipment.  The junction from the PE to the south-east of Slauson Avenue was the junction to the PE Whittier and Yorba Linda line.  It could be included as a dummy junction, but I would be tempted to leave it out and focus on the crossing.

slauson_mapslauson_1

To the north, not far south of Oscar’s Junction was Amoco Junction and tower.  The distinctive lattice-built tower spanned all four tracks and watched over the crossing and junction to the major PE Butte Street Yard (to the east and fully redeveloped on the aerial photo below) and the PE Santa Monica freight branch to the west.  The scene is made more interesting by the roads (Long Beach Avenue) lying both sides of the tracks.  Long Beach Avenue extended (and still extends) all the way from Oscar’s Junction south to Slauson Avenue).  Here, the interesting junction layout would have to be modelled, although it would again be a dummy.

amoco_map amoco_1 amoco_2

As can be seen from the photos and from Google Earth, Long Beach Avenue is flanked by light industrial structures and residential bungalows.  A chance for some good scenic modelling, and there are plenty of photos of the area available, although one might aim for ‘typical’ structures.

Finally, what would the modules look like.  Here’s an idea.  I’ve used 4′ modules to suit N-mod, but reduced the width to the N-club 400mm – it’s more portable and better suited to a linear scene like this.  I’ve also moved the tracks in from the edge of the board closer to the N-club locations.  This gives more room at the front of the layout and allows one to model the roads both sides of the track.  One further idea would be to have three 2′ 8″ modules rather than two 4′ ones.  This would still tie in with N-mod geometry, but the modules will fit easier in the small cars we have here in the UK.  I’ve drawn it all like this below.

modulesDo you think it would work?

Posted in Inspiration, Layout design, Prototype, Traction | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What do you care about?

Another short, but excellent post by Mike Cougill on the OST blog

What do trains help you to care about?

For what it’s worth, here’s my answer: trains help me remember times and events that are meaningful. Memories that I can only revisit in my mind.

Trains help me express a level of creativity in ways that other mediums don’t. Trains provide a theme and purpose for exploring what craftsmanship is to me and a way to view the work through an artistic lens rather than a technique or product driven one.

Trains help me understand that I have something to say and a distinct voice with which to say it.

You don’t have to understand, like or agree with any of this and I’m not on a crusade to convert anyone to my way of thinking. I’m gratified when others add to the conversation but I write about these things because I enjoy writing about them and, if I have anything to offer at all, it’s simply a different point of view.

So, ponder this week: what do trains help you care about? Maybe blog about it on your own or you’re welcome to comment here. Thanks for reading.

Regards,
Mike

Perhaps I’ve lost the creativity and craftsmanship that I was developing 40 years ago? Maybe it’s time to try and find it again!

 

Posted in Hints and tips, Inspiration, Layout design | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Has Rolls-Royce created the train of the future?

From the Daily Telegraph….

A new generation of more efficient, quieter and greener trains could be coming to Britain’s railway lines, driven by a new hybrid power system built by Rolls-Royce.The company – best known for its aircraft engines but which also has creates engines used on land and at sea – is developing a combined diesel-electric system that also incorporates batteries.

The system also utilises regenerative braking systems first seen in Formula 1 cars. These store energy in the batteries that is created by slowing down, and which would otherwise be wasted.

MTU, which comes under Rolls’ power systems division, has been testing the new design on a Siemens train for four years in Germany, in partnership with rail operator Deutsche Bahn.
The new system has been found to be 25pc more fuel-efficient than current trains and much quieter.

Rolls believes that its hybrid system could help Britain regain the leading role the country once held at the forefront of rail technology, and said its sees the UK as a “key” market.

I did like one comment on this article….

With the amount of slowing down our trains seem to do the adoption of regenerative braking systems will surely mean that they will run for next to nothing.

 

Posted in ESNG, Inspiration, Out and about, Prototype | Tagged , , | 1 Comment