Off my trolley – interurbans

WARNING – if you are from North America, please look away.  This is a confirmed UK resident writing about US railroads, so total accuracy is unlikely!  But I hope in this post to give some idea of the breadth of the prototype – as with ‘ordinary’ railroads, there is a prototype for everyone.  I’ll add plenty of links to other sites, rather than photographs – easier to do this than attribute everything…..

Let’s generalise and split the country into east, west and central USA.  In the east my impression is of smaller interurban lines linking towns.  Perhaps this was because the railroad infrastructure was so dense in this area, that there was little room for more expansive traction systems.  And railroads such as the Pennsylvania and the New Haven were already into electrification, especially for suburban services.  But there is the Aroostook Valley Railroad  carrying potatoes in Maine.  There is the Laurel Line, connecting Scranton and Wilkes-Barre in Pennsylvania, with a double tracked, largely third-rail system, with some overhead.  The main freight yard at Scranton had third-rail throughout – must have been before H&S!  The Laurel Line was also a prototype for a continuous run layout.  The line was double tracked, and at each end, the terminus was a tight, about 50 foot radius loop with the platform adjacent.  No reversing required….

Another small bridge route was the Piedmont and Northern in North Carolina – a short bridge route where some tracks are still used today.

Chicago was commuter land.  The North Shore Line and the South Shore line resembled suburban railroads in many ways, but instead of pantographs there were trolley poles and in places street running.  Freight was an important part of these lines, and some large electric locos could be seen.

The mid-West had extensive passenger interurban services, but freight tended to be carried by box-motors.  I have to include a link to the Indianapolis Traction Terminal –  a monster of a interurban station with an overall roof that could grace any railroad.

In the west of the USA, the traction railroads had a special flavour, where interurban services mixed with heavy freight services.  There were shortlines, such as the Central California Traction and the Yakima Valley Transportation Company.

But the jewels in the crown were the Pacific Electric Railway (note: railway not railroad) and the Sacramento Northern.  The Pacific Electric, in Los Angeles, was the largest electric railway system in the world in the 1920s, with 2,160 daily trains over 1,000 miles of track.  This included two four track mainline sections, where large express interurbans overtook smaller cars or trains of oil or fruit.  Before the freeway came, the Pacific Electric opened up the hinterland around central Los Angeles for development.

The Sacramento Northern boasted 183 miles of track around San Francisco.  It had some interesting features – some cars carried trolley poles, pantographs and third-rail shoes to operate on various parts of the system.  It also had a train ferry with overhead power.

The choice is endless!  Future posts will give some layout ideas for interurban model railroads…..

Posted in Jon's layout ramblings, Layout design, Traction | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ESNG meeting – 15 January 2014

The Christmas and New Year were well and truly over, and we had a dozen or so members at last night’s meeting.  It was especially good to see Sean, and be able to congratulate him on a small addition to the family.

We got the usual circuit up and running, and an interesting range of trains were on show.  David’s Pennsylvania and Union Pacific dooglebugs made a pleasant change from the usual multiple units.  British contributions included a rather nice nuclear flask train.  Paul’s long Japanese goods trains were present – I always wonder how Kato and Tomix make things stay on the track, when other manufacturers’ stock derails?

We spent some time talking about the ESNG annual show (on April 12th ).  It’s coming together, but I have a god bit of planning still to do.

Posted in ESNG, ESNG meetings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

How long to keep an old layout?

For the author, this would have been a academic question 15 years ago.  At that time I hadn’t actually ‘finished’ a layout.  This has only happened after joining ESNG and going ‘N’ gauge (after forays in OO, EM, OO9 and O).  Since then there’s been a 4×2 foot module built ‘for’ son Michael.  This was close to completion, but scrapped.  Then a quicky 4×1 foot scenic module ‘Two Bridges’ that has been to a number of shows with the ESNG N-mod circuit.  This module was simple, but very much complete and still exists.  It looks a bit tired, and is 3-track N-mod rather than the 4-track that we currently run.

Finally, there is Earl’s Wood, that can truly be said to have been completed.

earls_wood_2 earls_wood_1

Earl’s Wood started as a 4×2 foot continuous run module, but was later modified to a terminus to fiddle yard layout.  It also had three different fiddle yards, none totally successful.  But it does have working point motors, ballast, full scenery, a backscene, lots of people and animals.  (Including a dog that is walking along the parapet of the factory shown above.  My eyesight couldn’t tell the difference between an N-gauge dog and cat.)

So it runs, and is effectively complete.  To keep it running, I need to relay the tracks into the station so that I can build a better, fourth, fiddle yard.  It also occupies some prime real estate in my loft room.  Do I keep it, or do I scrap it and re-use the baseboard?  It’s a difficult choice, but at the moment I am leaning towards scrapping.  There are some buildings that can be re-used, to say nothing of all the vehicles and people and cats and dogs.  I have learnt a lot, had a lot of fun, and exhibited it four times.

Maybe I just need to suppress the squirrel in me, that wants to keep it.  But I forgot – there’s also 12 foot of ‘O’ gauge stored in the back loft….

Posted in ESNG, Jon's layout ramblings | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ESNG curry – 11 January 2014

Well, it is a meeting…..  And a very simple blog post.

Eleven out of the expected twelve intrepid members of ESNG enjoyed the delights of the Earlswood Ruchita (yet again) to see in the New Year.  As ever food, service, and of course the company, were very good.  This might even beat a running night for fun.  We all went home very full having indulged in a desert, and will probably dream of our next layout.

Posted in ESNG, ESNG meetings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Off my trolley – streetcars and trolley layouts

Again we need a cultural translation here: trolley = streetcar = tram.  Streetcars tended to be smaller that the big interurbans running between towns.  But you could find an interurban winding its way through the city traffic on its way to the city terminal.

What is missing from a trolley layout is extensive freight operations.  Freight cars might be seen on inner city tracks, but this was not common.  What you might see is a freight motor (in the UK think the Southern Region Motor Luggage Van) moving small quantities of freight around.  But the passenger service is intense, although it will consist of a single coach, or perhaps two.  (Having said all this, there will be exceptions to the rule somewhere – please don’t tell me I’m completely wrong).

So a trolley layout has real potential for a tight space.  Short trains, very sharp curves, lots of urban scenery to model.  There is a lot going for such a layout, if you can face the idea of a layout with little freight and few of the conventional railway buildings.

To illustrate the potential, here are two links to excellent layouts.  The first is Fred Miller’s HO scale trolley model site (http://www.fnbcreations.net/tractionfan/).  Here are a couple of photos from the site, showing the high detail and concentrated modelling.  If you wonder about the curves, they are 6 ¼” radius representing a prototype 45 ft radius – in HO scale.  Even TOMIX Japanese tram track has a smallest radius of 4″!

gc003 gc004

I was somewhat annoyed to find that the entire layout now lives in Charlotte’s Trolley museum.  We tried to visit the museum when visiting Charlotte –  but it was closed.  And that was before I discovered the layout was there.

The second layout is again HO and from Australia.  Victoria Street, living at http://glennofootscray.blogspot.com.au/ describes itself as:

“A small model tramway layout loosely based on the Melbourne Metropolitan Tramway Board (MMTB).  Originally set up as a test track, like all layouts evolved into some thing more, with a slight west suburban slant towards its location.

The modules are only 57cm long by 19cm deep, so far there are four complete modules (railway station and racecourse, the original modules), another module is the undecorated fiddle yard (city) and two recent modules are (the railway gates and the bend, Epsom Rd).  Victoria St can run as an end of line tramway, a heritage/regional (SEC) line, and a shuttle passenger service with short shunting at the station to service extra punters for the racecourse to a time table run to a 3:1 fast clock.”

Again note the size of the modules – again remember these are HO scale.  Below are photos from the site, showing the compact size.

7989917027_5fc61acab6_o   5818995435_a63f168b79_o

1458711_10152066299369664_362333344_nAnd finally, this photo does suggest that this blogger has visited the layout – unfortunately not, must be some relation.

Posted in Inspiration, Jon's layout ramblings, Layout design, Traction | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Review of 2013

It seems to be the done thing to produce a review of the year.  So what did 2013 bring for the Budgie:

  • A total lack of modelling for 8 months, thanks to too much engineering to do, especially Chinese dams, an Australian dam break mathematical model, and sewage works in Toronto and Vancouver.
  • Thanks to my antique appendix, and its removal, modelling kick started in September, and I’ve made more progress in the rest of the year than the past 18 months.
  • A successful ESNG exhibition in April was very satisfying.  (I’d better organise the next one ready for April).
  • Another visit to Stuttgart was great fun.
  • Model of the year was the Farish Blue Pullman.
  • Books of the year were publications on the Lehigh Valley, Pacific Electric, Central California Traction, the Ventnor West Branch and the Wisbech and Upwell Tramway.

And will 2014 be any better – who knows….

Posted in ESNG, General | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Layout design – different voices – simple layout, complex operation

Another interesting voice in the layout design world is Lance Mindheim, who most originally posts at http://www.lancemindheim.com/.

GMR47pic

He has built a number of very interesting layouts.  The first was a 20×20 foot N gauge layout of the Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville or as it’s usually known, the Monon in Indiana in 1955.

He then moved to modelling modern-day Miami in HO.  The small East Rail was a 10×10 foot L-shaped switching layout.  Simple, but lots of operation.

ZopsSmall images

The room-sized Downtown Spur occupies the full 20×20 foot of the railway room.  It is wonderful modelling, and a couple of photographs in a recent Model Railroader article really could have been the real thing.

Ant300 CourtyardSouthThumb

So, what are the design points we can learn from Lance’s brilliant modelling?

  1. The ordinary makes a good model.  It’s better to model a realistic square concrete box of a warehouse, than some fancy, and unrealistic, building.
  2. Switching takes time.  There’s the time at each road crossing.  There’s the flares to light at ungated crossings.  There’s the time to uncouple or couple the wagons.  There’s the time taken to walk from one end of the train to the other.  There’s the time taken to unlock points and relock them after switching.  It all adds up to a slow procedure if its done realistically.
  3. One siding can act as three or four, if there are a number of different industries, or different doors on a single building, that need cars spotted in front of them.

Lance’s blog includes a number of deceptively simple switching layouts.  But if operated as the prototype, even a couple of sidings can offer an hour or two’s instant entertainment.

(All pictures, from Lance Mindheim’s website)

Posted in Inspiration, Jon's layout ramblings, Layout design | Tagged , | 2 Comments

ESNG meeting – 2 January 2014

Well, who was going to turn up at the first meeting in 2014?

We got a very creditable nine members in attendance, including Ian back after time out for a broken arm.  So we had a full circuit up and running.  It was nice to see a US train on the circuit, thanks to Dave Stewart.  Two Union Pacific RS-somethings pulling some long tankers and a string of boxcars.  There were also a number of the new Farish Bullied coaches in attendance.  Very nice, and the similarity to BR Mk 1’s is obvious.

Minor excitement was caused by Derek the Apps’ Farish 2-6-0, that seemed to keep stopping on rail joints and points.  A close look showed that the front guard irons were very close to the track.  Allan suggested ‘gelding’ the loco with a set of rail cutters.  Sanity won the day, and Derek will apply a needle file to the offending objects.

So that was the first meeting in January….  Next stop, a curry evening on the 11th.

Posted in ESNG, ESNG meetings | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Jon’s modules – the thrill is gone…

large_4371674196

According to B.B. King and numerous other bluesmen.

You may have noted how my module posts have slowed up.  I seem to have been distracted from railway modelling over this Christmas.  Perhaps it’s the fact that I’ve now laid all the track and I’ve got all that exciting wiring and ballasting to do before I get on to the scenery.  Or maybe it’s the arrival of Bishop Tom Wright’s 1600 page magnum opus on Paul that has provided some good reading.  Or perhaps some rather non-festive music, amongst others the remixed versions of Eric Clapton’s 461 Ocean Boulevard, and a double album of John Lee Hooker playing the blues backed by Canned Heat.

No worries….  I’ll soon have my mojo working again!

Posted in Inspiration, Jon's layout ramblings | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

And a Happy New Year

Who knows what 2014 will bring?  There are some very interesting models promised by the UK manufacturers.  I am very much tempted by the Farish Merchant Navy and Dapol’s 33 and Maunsell coaches.  But no doubt they are still stuck in some Chinese factory.  Perhaps I ought to be realistic and limit myself to the Hornby Brighton Belle.  From the photos in Railway Modeller, it does seem to be progressing and looking about right.

As for Continental Europe and the USA, I’m not sure what is happening.  Again, they are probably slowed by the Chinese economy.   Maybe the area to watch is 3D printing and the Shapeways site.  The quality of 3D printing seems to improve by the week, and the levels of detail are certainly as good as resin cast models.  There are some very interesting interurbans in N gauge on the site, but no-one has ventured – yet – into a Pacific Electric car.  Now that would be a quick purchase….

Posted in General, The trade | Tagged , , | Leave a comment